Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Novel Update #1

I said in my last blog that I had decided what story to work on. Well, I was wrong. I vacillated for a while, bouncing back and forth between three different story ideas that I really want to work on. But I finally settled myself to work on the one I had originally decided to work on, because shut up and do it, Neil!

I have a tendency to start a project and then shoot off at the first shiny distraction that comes along. I've found that having clear goals and something of a reward can help keep me on track. My goals are already clear. Write a novel, and focus on quality more than quantity. Now a need a reward.

When I finish this novel, I'm going to buy a computer. Not just any computer, oh no. It will be the first computer I will acquire for the cluster computer I've been wanting to build for years.

Why do I want to build my own cluster computer, you ask? Because it would be totally awesome. What more could a computer science major wish for?

Monday, December 27, 2010

Novel time

I am going to write a novel. And I am going to chronicle my progress here on this blog. Why? Because I think keeping a public record of my progress will motivate me to actually make some progress. My friends can all laugh at me when I fail to keep going. Friends are useful like that.

I've completed NaNoWriMo a couple of times, and I had one hundred pages of a rough draft that I started back when I first began writing (which is lost now, sadly). So it's not like I haven't written in this quantity before. The difference, here, is going to be my concern for quality. So I expect it to go much slower than NaNo.

The first step: planning. I've already picked which story I want to work on, and it's one I've done a bit of planning on already. And since I don't usually plan much anyway, the planning stage shouldn't take too long. After that, the writing, which I expect to take several months at least. Once I have a rough draft, the editing.

I'll probably be doing other writing in the meantime. I'm planning on doing Milwordy again this year (write a million words in one year), this time with a hope of completing it. But I have a lot of free time that I don't utilize properly, so I think I can manage.

I'll try to update frequently. If I don't, nag me.

The project begins.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

In stories, I have a problem with species or societies that perpetuate themselves by inducting new members from outside the group. The group itself has no internal method of reproduction.

This isn't even an issue of morality. Yes, I find the actions of Star Trek's Borg, or Doctor Who's Cybermen, to be morally reprehensible. But you could be dealing with a gray and gray morality, or even a black and gray morality where these guys are the gray, and the true evil is much worse. Or the group could even be good, such as an order of monks that has taken vows of celibacy.

No, my problem is that such a system is unsustainable. It is doomed to fail, in the long run, unless very special conditions are met. Because the group has no internal method of reproduction, they are dependent on outsiders for new bodies. What happens when they've inducted everybody, and no outsiders remain? The group dies out. What happens when resistance to induction means it costs the group more than one member for every member it gains? The group dies out.

This last is why the standard zombie apocalypse scenario is ridiculous, by the way. I can believe in a virus that turns people into rage-filled cannibalistic killing machines. But when defenders often mow down dozens of zombies for every defender killed I have to wonder... how did so many people get infected in the first place?

The only way such a group can sustain itself is by carefully balancing how many members it loses with how many members it gains, and by balancing itself with broader populations. It would require careful and deliberate planning. I never see such planning in fiction.

This has always kind of bothered me. Just felt like ranting about it for a bit.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Blarg

You ever have one of those days where you just feel like blarg?

Eh, it happens from time to time. Yesterday I just felt like crap. I think my blarginess is just leftover from that. I'm going to help my roommate on his family farm today. Getting out and doing something ought to cheer me up, and he really needs the help. I don't know what I'll do when I get back, though. Maybe play a bit of WoW, or work on my paper for class. I also need to study for an exam on Wednesday, but it won't be a very hard one so I'm not too worried.

Not really much to say today, though. Just felt like posting something, mostly because I'm bored at the moment. Have a good day, everyone!

Friday, December 3, 2010

Semester is almost over

It's that time of year again. Fall semester is almost over, and winter break is about to begin.

I'm not really looking forward to it. I like it here in Bowling Green. There's places to go, stuff to do, and I've got all my friends within a few minutes walk. In Franklin I end up just sitting around the house, doing nothing, for days at a time.

Winter break is five weeks long. And, at the moment, I have absolutely no plans for the entire thing. Well... that isn't entirely true. One of my friends, who dropped out of NaNo due to a lack of time, is trying to organize a NaNo-like writing thing during the break. But that won't get me out of the house.

I'll be all right, though. Rent a few movies or something, do some writing, chat with people on Facebook. I'll get through the break. I'll just be bored a lot.

Can't wait for next semester, though. Found out that one of my good friends will be staying for another semester, even though she's graduating at the end of this semester. So I know I'll have at least one person to hang out with and bother.

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Gay Marriage

Ah, now here's a nice, spicy topic to blog about! I had a little argument with a relative today about gay marriage. It got me angry and worked up. So I'll rant here, since this is a convenient place.

So let's just get the main question out of the way. Should we allow gay marriage? Yes!

Why?

Ah, now that's a good question. But I think there is a better question: why not?

Let's look at a couple of the arguments against gay marriage.

One common argument is that marriage is intended to be between a man and a woman. That's how God intended it, and we shouldn't meddle with that. We must protect the sanctity of marriage.

I heard another argument today, that our taxes will be used to pay for workers to write up and file paperwork for gay marriages. Why should our tax money pay for their marriage?

I'm going to address the second argument first, because I'll want to spend more time on the first one.

Certain people have expressed the concern that their taxes will pay for workers to write up and file paperwork for gay marriages, and these certain people dislike this idea. However, they fail to realize that homosexuals pay just as much in taxes as the rest of us, and that the homosexual's taxes are used to pay for workers who write up and file paperwork for the straight person's marriage. They pay the same taxes, so why should they not have the same rights?

Ok, I'm done talking about taxes. Let's move on to the whole sanctity of marriage thing.

So, marriage was "intended to be between a man and a woman", right? Well, Biblically, that isn't quite true. If you want to go by the Bible, marriage was intended to be between a man and a woman before the eyes of God. The italicized part is important. Why? Because, according to the Christian traditions that these people are trying to base their arguments in, only Christians are married in the eyes of God.

Do Hindus have a Christian marriage? Do Muslims? What about atheists? No! None of these groups have Christian marriages... but no one stands out in a street protesting when two atheists go to get married, as long as they're of two different genders. Why is that? Why are people singling out this one group for persecution?

Because that's what this is. It's persecution. It's singling out one group of people and treating them poorly. Without any real reason, just because of a personal dislike for this group of people.

So tell me, why shouldn't homosexuals have all the same rights that I enjoy? What possible reason could we have for restricting their freedoms? Is there any real reason, or is it all just excuses for personal bigotry?